|
|
Managed care is
bringing one of the greatest abberancies in the practice of medicine in the
United States to the forefront as one of the topics for discussions and
change. The aberrancy concerns the method in which acute and critical care
services are provided for patients who are at the highest risk for resource
consumption and poor outcomes. The system is clamoring for cost effective
high quality care yet in most instances hospitalized patients do not have
24-hour access to physicians who specialize in the care of critical
illnesses. The current model under which most inpatient care is delivered
involves a situation in which the patient is seen once per day by his
attending physician and by several consultants. After those daily visits
most patient care is managed over the phone as nurses, respiratory
therapists, and others relay information to the physician team by phone.
As the acuity
of hospitalized patients rises along with the number of seniors enrolling in
Medicare-risk HMOs, financial pressures will force a reconsideration of the
historical approach to acute care coverage. The inevitable clinical logic of
providing legitimate in-house 24-hour coverage for the highest risk patients
will be forced into play by the financial realities of the times. key
decisions that result in huge expenditures, e.g., who is admitted to the
ICU, which antibiotics re used, which imagining modalities are warranted,
who should be resuscitated in the event of an arrest, etc., cannot be made
effectively over the phone at 3:00 a.m.
Clinicians and
administrators who are interested in succeeding with managing inpatient care
should pay close attention to the model at the St. Francis Medical Center in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Dr. John Hoyt, who is the current President of the
Society of Critical Care Medicine, heads a group of seven Board Certified
Critical Care specialists who have practiced at St. Francis in one form or
another for the last 12 years. As of January 1, 1996, the group entered into
a new contract with the Hospital wherein they provide in-house 24-hour
coverage for critically ill patients.
St. Francis has
750 beds, 42 of which are designated for critical care (22 medical-surgical,
8 cardiac, and 12 cardiac surgery). Additionally there are about 60
telemetry beds referred to as "step-down" and a four-bed intermediate care
unit. The hospital is not a trauma or transplant center but performs about
1,000 open heart procedures annually.
The Group's
daily census averages around 16-18 patients. The critical care physicians
function as automatic co-attendings for patients admitted to the
medical-surgical ICU and frequently consult on patients admitted to the
other units. Rounds are made on every patient twice per day and detailed
progress notes are dictated at least twice per patient per day. About 50% of
the patients have other consultants involved in their care, most commonly
nephrology for dialysis and infections disease for antibiotic
recommendations. About 70% of the patients have a critical fellow assigned
to them from the University of Pittsburgh program.
The call
schedule is structured around a seven day rotation in which the day
attending covers the service from 8 am to 5 pm and on the seventh day covers
for a straight 24-hour period. The night attending comes in at 5 pm; each
member of the Group takes three of four nights in house each month (the
Group's ages range is from 32 to 52!). About 68% of the payer mix is
Medicare and at present there is very little managed care. The Group
contracts out its billing, employs 2.5 office staff, and receives a small
portion of its income from the Hospitals as a guarantee against reduced
collections. Each member of the Group generates income for the corporation
in additional ways, i.e., teaching, critical care transport, research, and
ER coverage.
The Group is
collecting data regarding its performance. Thus far 7, 600 patients have
been entered into an APACHE II database. The predicted mortality rate for
these patients was 23% with an observed rate of 17%; the predicted ICU
length of stay was 4 days and the observed was 3 days.
This practice
model for inpatient coverage could be implemented at almost any facility
with modification that would take volume and payer mix into account.
Patients and the attending staff at St. Francis have access to unique talent
around the clock. Likewise, payers and administrators have a direct link to
a contracted provider group for questions concerning utilization and cost.
In communities where the physician oversupply is causing an emigration of
skills, groups who are willing to rotate in house call cal remain viable by
adopting a similar mode. Generalists (i.e. Internists and Family Physicians)
who increasingly are under pressure to see more outpatients will also be
incentivized to restructure the delivery of inpatient care in order to
relieve the stress of outpatient volume and improve the overall efficiency
of services offered through their managed-care organizations.
- by Bruce T.
Gipe , MD
Back to PCCMG Home
Page
Back to
Bibliography |
|
Improving Inpatient Performance and Relieving Outpatient Stress |
|
|